In addition to harvest, an unusually long, cold winter and continuing poor habitat conditions are two factors contributing to the recent drop in Maryland's crab population. Photo by Carrie B. Grisham
Back from the Brink or Still in Trouble?
The fact that we can't control Mother Nature makes it even more imperative that we focus on the elements we can control, especially reducing pollution to the Bay and maintaining sufficient numbers of spawning age crabs.
Also known as "beautiful swimmer," the blue crab is one of the more resilient of Chesapeake species, but its fate depends on many factors. With the drastic decline of the Bay's oysters in the 1980s, watermen began extending their crabbing efforts much later into the fall, the time they would normally have shifted to oystering. A decade or so later, the crab population had been cut in half to around 300 million. Not only was the blue crab itself depleted, so too were the oyster reefs and underwater grasses that provide it with food, shelter, and oxygen.
The Maryland Department of Natural Resources and Virginia Institute of Marine Science monitor the Bay's crab population with a comprehensive survey conducted in the winter when crabs are dormant. Survey data shows that the population remained at a low level until 2008, when decision makers finally agreed to put in place new, science-based guidelines for the fishery, requiring reducing the catch of female crabs to a sustainable level. Within two years the population had doubled and watermen and fisheries scientists were hopeful the population was coming back from the brink. But 2012-2013 survey numbers dropped back to 300 million—a drastic loss even considering that the crab population has always been prone to fluctuations. And this year's survey numbers were no better.
These most recent numbers serve as a reminder of just how fragile and complex the process of restoration can be and why continual vigilance is necessary if we are to bring back not only a sustainable crab fishery, but a healthy, sustainable Bay.
The survey released in May 2014 showed mixed results for the blue crab population.
- The total number of juvenile crabs increased by about 80 million from 2013's record low of about 100 million.
- The total number of spawning age crabs dropped by the same amount.
According to CBF Director of Fisheries Bill Goldsborough, "Clearly one factor was the cold winter, which killed an estimated 28 percent of adult crabs in Maryland waters." In a May 2014 blog post, Goldsborough outlined CBF's call for continued prudent management and conservative harvests.
The fact that we can't control Mother Nature makes it even more imperative that we focus on the elements we can control, especially reducing pollution to the Bay and maintaining higher numbers of spawning age female crabs. Reducing the levels of nutrients reaching the Bay from farms and lawns and better managing stormwater runoff before it gets into rivers and streams, will help mitigate weather extremes, improve water quality, and contribute to the recovery of both blue crabs and Bay grasses.
Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, the other Bay states, and the District of Columbia all committed to reducing pollution from all sources as their part of their Clean Water Blueprint.
Creating a Sustainable Fishery
"The crab population is truncated, meaning we catch crabs so quickly, there are very few crabs bigger than legal size," Goldsborough said. "As a result, the fishery is very dependent on each year class that comes in.
"And that creates instability, which is not a good thing for the crabs or the crabbers. We want more older crabs in the crab population so that we have ongoing high reproductive potential—which helps stabilize the population, and larger crabs on average in the catch—which are the most valuable in the market."
Essential for building stability in the crab population is for Maryland and Virginia to continue applying the science-based guidelines for managing the fishery adopted in 2008, which help avoid overfishing. Since 2008, fisheries managers in Maryland and Virginia have been keeping total annual harvests below 46 percent of all crabs and 25.5 percent of all females.
"The blue crab was really affected most by overexploitation by fishing," said Dr. Thomas Miller, Director of the Chesapeake Biological Lab. "A decade ago, they were experiencing 70 percent removal rates. And you can't take 70 percent of the trees and still have a forest. And if you take 70 percent of the crabs, you no longer have a healthy crab stock."
The Fight to Shrink "Dead Zones"
Another strategy to improve the long-term stability and health of the Chesapeake's crab populations is to cut significantly the nitrogen and phosphorus pollution into the Bay. Nitrogen and phosphorus stimulate explosive growth of algae. Algal blooms darken the water, blocking light and killing underwater grasses that crabs need for shelter. Algal blooms fed by polluted runoff quickly die and decay, sucking up oxygen and creating "dead zones." The dead zones force crabs to find oxygen in shallow waters where they are more easily caught.
"Dead zones" also kill the food that crabs eat, destroying or preventing the growth of 75,000 metric tons of clams and worms a year in the estuary, according to a scientific study in the journal Science. That is enough food to support half the commercial crab harvest.
In an effort to shrink the Bay's "dead zones," the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency issued pollution targets for the Chesapeake Bay in December 2010. These targets have come under attack by industry lobbying groups, however, and CBF is fighting to defend them in court and in Congress.
At the center of this fight are blue crabs and the more than 6,000 watermen and other workers who depend on the crabs for their livelihoods.